Share
A Health Setback on the Horizon?:
Are we taking a step backwards in environmental health standards? According to the Trump administration's recent proposals, we just might be. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has published a list of 31 regulations that they plan to scale back or even eliminate altogether. This may sound like just another day in policies and paperwork, but there’s a bit more at stake.
Paging Dr. Earth:
It seems the environment is in need of a serious check-up. A Guardian analysis has discovered that the rules set for removal are credited with saving almost 200,000 lives in upcoming years. We're not just talking about the protection of cute and cuddly wildlife here – we’re discussing the health and wellbeing of people.
Harmful Air:
Among the listed health offenders are rules pertaining to air pollution from cars and power plants, mercury emissions (a serious neurotoxin), and the protection of clean water. This might all seem a bit technical, but let's put it simply: without these rules, we could experience a rise in heart problems, respiratory disorders, and other health issues affected by poor air and water quality. It's like having a health shield against pollution, and some folks are considering throwing that shield away.
The Wallet Factor:
There’s more! It seems our wallets might feel a bit healthier with these regulations too. According to the EPA’s own analysis, these legislations save the economy far more money than businesses spend on implementing new pollution controls. In fact, the expected economic benefit ratio to compliance costs is approximately six to one.
Breathe Easier:
What's more, about one in 12 Americans who have asthma are particularly susceptible to increased air pollution that could result if these rules were removed. Doesn't mean much? Picture this: Without these regulations, we could see an increase of 100 million symptomatic asthma incidents across the U.S. by 2050. Now that's a lot of wheezing!
The Bottom Line:
So, what's it all about? It appears that in an attempt to increase economic savings, we might be risking not only our planet's well-being but also ours and our children's. The combination of reducing rules and reducing enforcement staff at the EPA doesn't add up to a healthier future. Keep your fingers crossed that we find a solution that saves both green cash and our green Earth.
We hope you enjoyed this article. Please feel free to leave a comment below if you want to engage in the discussion.
If you want to read more like this, make sure to check out our Blog and follow us on Instagram. If you are interested in truly sustainable products, check out our Shop.
Check out the original source here.