Share
Approximately half of the nature-friendly enhancements promised by developers for new homes in England are missing in action. This data comes from a study by the University of Sheffield of almost 6,000 newly constructed houses. A range of ecological enhancements, such as freshly planted trees, bird boxes, ponds, and hedgerows were agreed upon in planning permissions. However, according to the study, only 53% of these have been delivered.
Details on the Missing Eco-enthusiasm:
Some specific statistics shed light on the lack of commitment to these ecological boosts. For instance, 39% of trees from planting plans were either absent or dead. Bird boxes and bat boxes were missing 75% of the time. Developers left out 83% of hedgehog highways entirely, and all bug boxes stipulated in the plans were nowhere to be found. The survey also found fewer native hedges and wet grasslands than developers had promised.
Newts, Developers, and the Future of Housing:
These findings come at a time when governmental policy revolves around creating more natural habitats in new housing. This policy aims to balance a housebuilding boom alongside a halt to species decline. However, if developers continue to break legally binding pledges to ecological growth, this could lead to a significant harm to nature. The study also discovered that the eco-friendly measures that were implemented were often done incorrectly or were damaged, leading to negative impacts on local wildlife.
Punishment for Eco-betrayal?:
Activists like the co-founder of Wild Justice, Chris Packham, are demanding consequences for the discrepancy between promises for wildlife protection and the reality of developed housing sites. He suggests implementing fines or even "banging them up." The study revealed that some newly constructed housing contributed as little as 0% of the promised eco-friendly features, while the most compliant delivered 95%. The lack of adherence was unaffected by the development's size, location, or developer type.
Implications for North America:
The results of the survey reveal systemic issues concerning housing development and nature preservation that are also prevalent in the US and Canada. Developers often gamble on the likelihood that their implemented provisions will not get checked for adherence to planning permissions. As the government encourages faster urbanisation through ecological damage mitigation, it may become crucial to give adequate resources to planning enforcement systems to protect wildlife effectively.
Details on the Missing Eco-enthusiasm:
Some specific statistics shed light on the lack of commitment to these ecological boosts. For instance, 39% of trees from planting plans were either absent or dead. Bird boxes and bat boxes were missing 75% of the time. Developers left out 83% of hedgehog highways entirely, and all bug boxes stipulated in the plans were nowhere to be found. The survey also found fewer native hedges and wet grasslands than developers had promised.
Newts, Developers, and the Future of Housing:
These findings come at a time when governmental policy revolves around creating more natural habitats in new housing. This policy aims to balance a housebuilding boom alongside a halt to species decline. However, if developers continue to break legally binding pledges to ecological growth, this could lead to a significant harm to nature. The study also discovered that the eco-friendly measures that were implemented were often done incorrectly or were damaged, leading to negative impacts on local wildlife.
Punishment for Eco-betrayal?:
Activists like the co-founder of Wild Justice, Chris Packham, are demanding consequences for the discrepancy between promises for wildlife protection and the reality of developed housing sites. He suggests implementing fines or even "banging them up." The study revealed that some newly constructed housing contributed as little as 0% of the promised eco-friendly features, while the most compliant delivered 95%. The lack of adherence was unaffected by the development's size, location, or developer type.
Implications for North America:
The results of the survey reveal systemic issues concerning housing development and nature preservation that are also prevalent in the US and Canada. Developers often gamble on the likelihood that their implemented provisions will not get checked for adherence to planning permissions. As the government encourages faster urbanisation through ecological damage mitigation, it may become crucial to give adequate resources to planning enforcement systems to protect wildlife effectively.
We hope you enjoyed this article. Please feel free to leave a comment below if you want to engage in the discussion.
If you want to read more like this, make sure to check out our Blog and follow us on Instagram. If you are interested in truly sustainable products, check out our Shop.
Check out the original source here.
