Period Pads Contain PFAS That Mess With Fertility [SWOP NEWS]
Share
Lawsuit Filed:
A California lawsuit demands that Carefree menstrual pads and their parent company, Edgewell Personal Care, remove toxic PFAS "forever chemicals" from their products or affix warning labels to the packaging.
Health Risks:
PFAS in menstrual pads pose a threat to reproductive health, including hormone disruption, low birth weight, infertility, and fetal immune toxicity.
Testing Results:
Tests conducted by the Ecological Alliance found PFOA, a harmful PFAS compound, leaching from the menstrual pads at approximately 756 parts per trillion (ppt) per hour.
Regulatory Gap:
Despite the EPA's determination that no level of PFOA exposure in drinking water is considered safe, there are nearly no federal regulations governing PFAS in consumer goods.
Absorption Concerns:
Skin may absorb PFAS at significantly higher rates than previously understood, raising alarms about products that remain in contact with women's skin for extended periods.
Legal Action:
The lawsuit is filed under California's Proposition 65, which mandates that businesses inform consumers if their products contain harmful chemicals.
Company Response:
Edgewell has yet to provide a response to requests for comments regarding the allegations.
Potential Consequences:
The lawsuit requests that the court halt the sale of these products until they are devoid of the toxic chemicals, and the company may reformulate products or change their supply chains if faced with such allegations.
A California lawsuit demands that Carefree menstrual pads and their parent company, Edgewell Personal Care, remove toxic PFAS "forever chemicals" from their products or affix warning labels to the packaging.
Health Risks:
PFAS in menstrual pads pose a threat to reproductive health, including hormone disruption, low birth weight, infertility, and fetal immune toxicity.
Testing Results:
Tests conducted by the Ecological Alliance found PFOA, a harmful PFAS compound, leaching from the menstrual pads at approximately 756 parts per trillion (ppt) per hour.
Regulatory Gap:
Despite the EPA's determination that no level of PFOA exposure in drinking water is considered safe, there are nearly no federal regulations governing PFAS in consumer goods.
Absorption Concerns:
Skin may absorb PFAS at significantly higher rates than previously understood, raising alarms about products that remain in contact with women's skin for extended periods.
Legal Action:
The lawsuit is filed under California's Proposition 65, which mandates that businesses inform consumers if their products contain harmful chemicals.
Company Response:
Edgewell has yet to provide a response to requests for comments regarding the allegations.
Potential Consequences:
The lawsuit requests that the court halt the sale of these products until they are devoid of the toxic chemicals, and the company may reformulate products or change their supply chains if faced with such allegations.
We hope you enjoyed this article. Please feel free to leave a comment below if you want to engage in the discussion.
If you want to read more like this, make sure to check out our Blog and follow us on Instagram. If you are interested in truly sustainable products, check out our Shop.
Check out the original source here.
